Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1402

reference
557-tree-1
name
1402
tree-preservation-order

undefined

557-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028932 50.882330)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028876 50.882324,-1.028878 50.882335,-1.028886 50.882345,-1.028898 50.882353,-1.028914 50.882358,-1.028932 50.882360,-1.028949 50.882359,-1.028965 50.882354,-1.028978 50.882346,-1.028986 50.882336,-1.028989 50.882325,-1.028987 50.882314,-1.028979 50.882303,-1.028966 50.882295,-1.028951 50.882290,-1.028933 50.882288,-1.028916 50.882290,-1.028900 50.882295,-1.028887 50.882303,-1.028879 50.882313,-1.028876 50.882324)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL